Montana n: A state of the northwest United States bordering on Canada. Admitted as the 41st state in 1889. The fourth largest state in the union, it includes vast prairies and numerous majestic mountain ranges.
Syn: Treasure State, Big Sky Country, Last Best Place.
Jones n: slang. An addiction or very deep craving.
Wednesday, December 13, 2006
Free trade and the Flathead
Employment in the Flathead Valley is making some waves these days. The Missoulian has a take on it. Left in the West has a take on it, even David Sirota has a take on it. I think most of them have it wrong on one detail or another.
Left in the West and David Sirota are trying to spin this as some big free trade issue. Reading the comments on the Sirota blog has my head spinning over how out of touch some people really are. There are arguments about the minimum wage and securing our borders against immigrants and free trade agreements and about THE MAN putting the worker down. What a bunch of hookum.
The one tiny little detail that everyone is missing here is why the Flathead labor market is so weird. The Flathead Valley is a retirement destination. Retirees with no jobs and no need for jobs are arriving in droves. They are brining with them retirement money and a demand for services but they are not bringing with them any young people or working class families to provide the services. Demand for services and service workers is outpacing the supply.
To make it worse, the influx of retirees has wacked out the real estate market. Even though wages are above average high in the Flathead, prices of homes are still out of reach for the working stiff. In other words, even with the above average wages there is no incentive for working class persons to move here because there is no place to live and no way to build up a nest egg.
So now we have a supply and demand problem in the labor market. Employers are fighting a difficult fight to simply keep their businesses staffed. Some of the things they are doing includes raising wages and benefits but that does not solve anything when there are not enough workers to go around. So employers have to hire from outside the area. The novelty here is that some employers are looking outside the country.
There are those who call this a free trade issue and think that employers are trying to screw over the American worker by using foreign labor to keep wages down. They say all this is an international free trade problem and an illegal immigrant problem and a higher minimum wages will solve it and border control will solve it and if corporations simply cared more for their workers that would solve it. What a bunch of hookum. This might be true if there was any significant amount of unemployment. Or it might be true if wages for the Montanan workers here were not well above average, above the minimum, and in many cases well above the recently voted raised minimum.
Hypothetically even if we perfectly sealed the borders and totally denied work visas to foreigners and raised minimum wages to the point just shy of shopkeepers going bankrupt trying to meet their payroll, none of that, at least in the Flathead Valley, would make the problem go away. That is because there are not enough workers to go around. There is not enough affordable housing and non-wage incentive to bring more workers in. And the labor demand is still increasing faster than the supply.
In other words it is not a big international free trade issue, it is not a problem with THE MAN keeping the little guy down. It is simply supply and demand doing its thing. Theoretically if things keep going like they are, incoming retirees will eventually decide that the Flathead is too expensive to live in with not enough services and amenities and stop coming or even move out. I think they call this a supply and demand correction. Unfortunately waiting for it to happen is still painful for all the people on the short end of the supply/demand stick.
Sure, if we were to regulate or change some of the free trade labor laws, or use side agreements or whatever there would be some small affect on local labor conditions. But it will not solve the problem or do much to make the world a better place. If we want to improve the standard of living for the working class everyman in the Flathead Valley, don't go looking to regulate the supply and demand of international labor. Wages are already pretty high here, what needs to change is the non-wage incentives for workers to live here. Perhaps some working class tax breaks, insurance breaks, or here is a radical idea. Lets improve on the supply of affordable housing.
To accomplish this I think we need to lower the demand for the Flathead as a retirement destination. One good way would be if Mother Nature gave us a good long, hard, cold, old school, weeks of bitter cold, bursting pipes, car wont start, nasty winter. That would help drive some retirees out. But then again that would make this a global warming issue instead of a free trade issue. How about we just put up some 'Californian go home' billboards. That worked pretty well at solving the meth problem.
Labels: economy, Employment, Flathead, free trade, Labor, opinion, wages, workers
There is more Jones in the archives: February 2005 March 2005 April 2005 May 2005 June 2005 July 2005 August 2005 September 2005 October 2005 November 2005 December 2005 January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006 May 2006 June 2006 July 2006 August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 March 2007 April 2007 May 2007 June 2007 July 2007 August 2007 September 2007 October 2007 November 2007 December 2007 January 2008 February 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 August 2008 September 2008 October 2008 November 2008 December 2008 January 2009 February 2009 March 2009 April 2009 May 2009 June 2009 December 2009 January 2010 May 2014